Confession: I’m a purist when it comes to books and am very picky when it comes to on-screen adaptations of popular and well-loved works of fiction. I watch these films with the critical eye of a book lover and am constantly comparing details from the book to those on the big screen. And these are 7 books that I feel have not been done justice with. They’re so much better than their movies!
Snapshot Survey
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
Please subscribe for your personalized newsletter:
1. Pride & Prejudice
One of my favorite books of all time, the 2005 movie of the same name does NO justice to it at all. None. Sure, it may be a watchable movie and if you’ve not read the book you would even enjoy it. However, if you get a chance, read the original novel by Jane Austen and you’ll find so much more depth to the characters and story.
[Note: I’m not including the 1994 TV mini-series here because that wouldn’t technically qualify as a movie. But that is one awesome adaptation of the book.]
2. Harry Potter (1-7)
Don’t bite my head off here please but I really think the Harry Potter books are way better than their movies. And I’m sure a lot of HP loyalists will think like me. There is just so much more detail, so many more characters and so many little plots in the books that you just don’t see on the big screen. And so whenever I need my magic fix, I’ll head to my bookshelf and not my TV.
Frequently asked questions
3. Charlie & the Chocolate Factory
Nobody who has read this Roald Dahl classic will question this. As good an actor as Johnny Depp is, he was woefully disappointing as Willy Wonka. And don’t even get me started on deviations from the original, much loved across the world, story. Stick to the book for this one, I say.
4. Bridget Jones’s Diary
Oh dear, where do I even start here? I love the book. But casting Colin Firth as a main character ruined it for me completely. Why? Because in the book, the character of Bridget Jones is a fan of (wait for it) Colin Firth, the actor! Now you see the ridiculousness of the whole thing? Add to this several plot changes and I’d rather stick with reading the book here.
5. The Lord of the Rings (Trilogy)
As good as the movies are, the books are just so much better. SO MUCH BETTER. And that’s all I have to say about this.
6. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy
I don’t think any movie can ever capture the brilliance that this book is. And honestly, to get a lot of the jokes in the movie, you have to have read the book. Otherwise you’re just going to be left wondering what happened there?!
7. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Stieg Larsson’s book is so, so good. And the movies (both the US and the Swedish versions) are nowhere close. There is just so much more to the book than what the movies show. The book leaves you totally gripped and I for one couldn’t put it down. I wish I could say the same about the movies though!
There is something about the written word that is difficult to translate into a movie that is as close to the original story as possible. A lot of filmmakers do get it right and some miss the spot when adapting books into movies. These are 7 books that I think are way better than their movies. What books make your list?
Comments
Godzilla: It seems pretty obvious that the book would be better. Considering the author has infinite space to include any and all details they want.
Seriously: Charlie and the Chocolate factory is amazing, I think Johnny portrayed Willy Wonka perfectly!
Arantxa: If you read for example Percy Jackson or The Mortal Instruments you'll know this suffering 😕
Shweta: How can u frgt fifty shades of grey by E. L. James
Kitty: Book! Better than the book! Lol
Hazem: I totally agree with u Avantika, but since when did we ever watch a movie that's better than the written book. It's like every movie I saw was much better in my head before. But to tell u the truth I think that when we leave it all to our imagination it gets really exciting, u see...in my head I have no limitations I can cast whoever I want to play whatever role I choose, I can shoot right across the street or in a galaxy far far away. In my head productions I don't have to worry about budget I guess; maybe that's why :)
Emma: Ps I love u ... The only good thing about the film was Gerard butler ...
peony: Fifty shades film was dreadful. Book just as bad but film atrocious
Beryl: @Kitty Eva. I agree ! I cringed when I saw that film! When she hobbled his ankles ? Yell! I also thought Cujo out of this world. Nearly fell off my chair when Cujo jumped up at the car window! In fact I think all Stephen King's books make better films. Christine ? When the car just waits menacingly ?
Nerd_Girl_2091: Let's see, Percy Jackson, The Maze Runner, The Saddle Club (okay that was a series adapted into a series, but I loved the books and couldn't stand to watch the show), Tuck Everlasting (although the movie is really good, the book in depth character conflict rather than just showing the love story), The Hunger Games trilogy (Although Frances Lawrence has done a better job than most), etc. Honestly I feel books are always better! The only Movie EVER that was better than the book it was based on would be Aquamarine. The movie was adventurous and fun and left you with the lingering promise of future adventures left untold, while the book was short and dull and left the girls with nothing but their memories of the past.
:
Feedback Junction
Where Thoughts and Opinions Converge